Roseavenue.org

 



Sunday, October 26, 2008 pm            Return to Index 

PREMILLENIALISM EXAMINED (7)
The Thousand Year Reign of Christ

We have  been studying the theory of premillenialism in detail, noting various pillars and aspects of the doctrine and exposing why it is false.  Every element of the theory involves the twisting of scripture and taking various texts out of their context.  Today, we reach the culmination of this study by addressing the 1000 year reign of Christ.  That is what it is all about.

 

I.                     The Theory Described

a.            The thousand year reign of the Lord Jesus Christ on earth at the close of the ages seems to be the most obvious choice for what can be considered to be the Great Climax of World History. This is because it presents Christ as absolute King and Lord over all Creation. It is a time when all nations and rulerships will have to acknowledge His authority, power, and deity.

     The Millennium will be the only time in world history when the entire population of the world will know of and be governed by the Lord Jesus Christ. The events of this final thousand years have never been experienced before and will never be repeated on this present earth again.

     There is a need for such a period so that the prophecies regarding Israel and their blessings can be fulfilled. It is not possible for them to be fully blessed as the Scriptures describe until that day when their Messiah, the Lord Jesus Christ, reigns from Jerusalem. Such a Millennium is predicted by many of the prophets including Isaiah, Daniel, Micah, and Zechariah:

      NOTE: The premise of the need for Him to reign is that O.T. prophecies have not been fulfilled.  The ones quoted with the above statement include: Isaiah 9:6, 65:19-25; Daniel 7:13-14; Micah 4:1-8; Zechariah 14:3-9, Isa. 2:2-4

      It will also include the church (Rev. 2:26-27, 3:21, 5:10, 20:4) and possibly OT saints (Ezek. 37:11-14). http://www.lwbc.co.uk/millennial_reign_of_christ.htm  (Living Word Bible Church)

 

b.            In an article entitled, “The Millennial Reign of Christ” written by Jack Hughes, we find a description of what is supposed to happen.  This article explains that Christ has “a universal reign, a spiritual reign, and a physical earthly reign.”  Distinction is made between these three.  The universal reign is based upon the deity of Christ.  In this article He is described as, “one of the three members of the triune Godhead or Trinity.” As a result it is pointed out that any reference to God’s rule, especially before His birth, “is a reference to Christ’s rule.”  The point is that He ruled all of creation.  Passages like Psalm 10:16, 22:28, “for the kingdom is the Lord’s and he rules over the nations,”  etc. point to His eternal rule.  The point being that “God has, is, and will forever reign over all creation.”  This includes Christ. (I agree with this reign).
        Second is His spiritual reign, “The New Testament teaches that Christ is spiritually reigning over the lives of those who know and love Him.”  I agree with this reign as well (cf. Col. 1:13).  It is noted, “When the Gospel is preached and people repent, believe, and are saved, they become citizens of the kingdom.  They become the subjects of Christ.  Even though Christ is not literally ruling and reigning on earth at this time, yet His kingdom is growing as the subjects of His kingdom are increasing.” HOWEVER in the article it is pointed out that Jesus offered this reign to the Jews, but He never “ruled and reigned from Jerusalem.  He has never proven himself to be the King of kings.”  Thus the need for another rule.
        The article then proceeds to describe the future physical reign of Christ noting that after the 7 years of tribulation “Jesus will come a second time to earth” as King of kings and Lord of lords, etc.  “He will enter physically into time, space, and history where He will prove to angels, demons, and men that He is the King of kings, not only in title but in deed.”   He proceeds to describe the 1000 year reign using passages like Dan. 2:44, Isa. 2:2-4, 11:6-9, 65:20, etc.  Finally, Rev. 20:1-7 is quoted as the passage which defines the timeframe of 1000 years.  
http://www.calvarybiblechurch.org/calvary_review.aspx/2003/11/1   A website maintained by Calvary Baptist Church in Burbank, CA. 

c.        This article pretty much summarizes the 1000 year reign of Christ from a premillenial perspective and notes some of the passages and arguments used to substantiate it.  BUT what does the Bible say?

II.                  Examining the 1000 year reign of Christ

a.        Figurative language of the text –

                                                   i.      The figurative message of the book. We have continued to notice the spiritual message of this book.  It is CLEAR that much of what is written is SYMBOLIC (See Rev. 1:1-2).  This includes the numbers in this book, as we have noted.

b.       The Number 1000 in other texts

                                                   i.      Deut. 7:9

                                                  ii.      Psalm 50:10

                                                iii.      Psalm 105:8

                                                iv.      2 Peter 3:8, with the Lord, a thousand years is as one day.

                                                  v.      The number represents a perfect (full and complete) period of time in which the righteous who overcame the dragon (Satan) and his minions (beasts, harlot, etc.) reign with Christ

                                                vi.      Why is 1000 years literal, but other elements figurative? Satan bound (with a chain), bottomless pit, a dragon, a physical seal upon Satan, beheaded souls, etc.

c.        What the text does NOT mention

                                                   i.      The second coming of Christ

                                                  ii.      Christ reigning on earth

                                                iii.      A bodily resurrection – note what John saw was “souls” (20:4).

                                                iv.      The literal throne of David

                                                  v.      Physical Jerusalem!

                                                vi.      Us, the text says “they lived and reigned with Him.”  The “they” is described as the martyred saints mentioned above. The grammatical context describes this as an act (aorist tense) which is “represented as certain or realized” (Indicative mood - Wheeler’s Greek Syntax Notes). It is portrayed as a fact.  This text is fulfillment of Rev. 6:9-11 where souls under that altar are crying for vengeance.  Now they have it.  Note differences:

The Avenging of the Saints

Rev. 6:9-11

Rev. 20:4

Souls of the slain

Souls of the beheaded

Underneath the altar

Sitting on thrones

Crying for judgment

Given judgment

Scene of defeat

Scene of victory

                                               vii.      The text IS dealing with the suffering saints of the book!  Any relevant interpretation must keep that in mind.

d.       The nature of the kingdom STILL under consideration

                                                   i.      Spiritual – Christ now reigning and will until 2nd coming – 1 Cor. 15:22-28, Heb. 10:12-13, Acts 2:30-31, etc.  We have noted many passages referring to kingdom – Rom. 14:17, John 18:36, etc.

                                                  ii.      We are reigning with Christ NOW!  Eph. 2:5-6, Rev. 5:9-10, Rom. 5:17

e.       Satan HAS been bound – Matt. 12:28-29, Heb. 2:14-15, Eph. 4:8;
1 Pet. 5:8-9, Jas 4:7 – we can resist him.  1 Cor. 10:13 – we CAN escape.

f.         What about OT prophecies previously mentioned?

                                                   i.      We have noted how the contexts point to the time of the Roman Empire when Christ would establish His kingdom.  That is one reason many refer to the failure of Jesus to establish His kingdom when He came (they don’t call it that, but what else is it?).  They see the fulfillment of the descriptions of the kingdom as being literal and physical.  That is why they conclude Christ MUST come back to earth.

                                                  ii.      Here is a thought?  What if Rev. 20:4-6 were NOT in scripture?  One commentator observes that if these verses were omitted, “no one would ever have dreamed of a literal thousand years of Christ’s reign upon the earth…Yet, whole systems of eschatology, theology, and philosophy of history have been constructed on this precarious basis of highly symbolical verses.” (Ray Summers, p. 203).  
The point is that because of Rev. 20, Premillenialists have run to numerous Old Testament prophecies (like the ones being discussed here) which deal with the spiritual kingdom of Christ and declared them unfulfilled because they are looking for a physical kingdom on this earth.  And to do this they have to make Rev. 20 literal, at LEAST the part about the 1000 years!

g.        What is the message of this text? 
The wicked who troubled the saints to whom this letter was written were overcome and defeated FOREVER (note the beast and false prophet were cast into the lake of fire, i.e. hell).  Satan’s power was restricted – he was put on a leash.  While the physical kingdom of Rome fell, the kingdom of God (spiritually) continues to this day and will do so until He returns.  The godly who overcame the enemies of God in this book are rewarded with being comforted with Christ and that for which they faithfully stood remains, while those defeated and overcome by Christ and His saints do NOT live on, i.e. the kingdom of Rome in Revelation is NO more(will not live for the 1000 years). 
NOTE: At the end of this timeframe, which we have established as a figurative number, ALL will arise to stand before God in judgment, INCLUDING those defeated by our Lord that are addressed in this letter. John 5:28-29.

h.       Why bring Christ back to earth?

And thus we can see that like everything else about premillenialism, this is false and NOT the proper interpretation of scripture.   
       In an article written to refute “The Millennial Reign of Christ” we find the following conclusion dealing with the fascination of this doctrine.  It says, “Much of the ‘Left Behind’ ideology presumes that because of events in the Middle East today this is the last generation before the rapture.  Christians are exhorted in scripture to be ready for the end, which may come at any time.  But the idea that this is the last generation invests in us and our time, a sense of self-inflated importance that is not appropriate for biblical faith.”  I say AMEN!  Rather then trusting in a fanciful theory, let us simply trust in His word.  Christ will come at the appointed time and we BETTER be ready.  Are you?